Archive for June, 2009

IS THE USHMM A BROTHEL ?

Friday, June 12th, 2009

OUR HOLOCAUSTS : AREN’T WE VICTIMS, REALLY ?

Steve Pollack

 

In the beginning, you’re not quite sure what to make of Tova Reich’s “My Holocaust.” Where is she going with all this lampooning of Holocaust survivors, trips to Auschwitz and the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum?

It’s not until you’ve gotten more than halfway through the book that you realize Reich’s mockery is not limited to Holocaust survivors: with this book she’s likely to offend Catholics, Poles, Germans, Buddhists, Israelis, Palestinians, Mormons, New Age-hippie-meditation types, second-generation Holocaust survivors and especially all those big-shot donors who paid to have their names put on plaques at the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum.

Now, back to Reich’s Holocaust survivors and one in particular: Maurice Messer.

Messer, who’s as endearing a character as you’ll find anywhere, is the wheeler-dealer chairman of the Holocaust museum who likes to boast of his connections to the White House and his days as a partisan resistance fighter. Of course, only his children and fellow survivors know Maurice never actually fought the Nazis during the war, but exposing him as a fraud would be bad for the Jews so they just think of it as a harmless inside joke.

Maurice, his hapless son, Norman, and his chief of staff, the Rabbi Dr. Monty Pincus, spend all of their time and energy soliciting large donations for the museum from wealthy Jews. As Reich makes clear, their ‘product’ is the Holocaust and Maurice is the ultimate pitch man. At the museum one day, Maurice finds spiritual solace at the Founders’ Wall:

This wall was his supreme creation. It was the monument to his greatest achievements, inscribed like a Rosetta stone with the chronicle of his triumphs, which only he could truly decipher. For a long time he gazed at the names on the wall, the roster of his precious donors of one million dollars or more, and was suffused with emotion as he recalled the details of each and every deal — how to reach this one on his private island he had retched nonstop over the side of a boat in the Bermuda Triangle, how at the second meeting in the San Francisco penthouse to extract the gift of a lifetime in the estate planning of that one, the prospect had appeared wearing a surgical mask because, as his feygele assistant nonchalantly explained, Maurice had a habit of standing too close and spitting too wildly from excitement in the climatic moments of a fund-raising pitch, and so on and so forth down the roll of his princely benefactors.

Alas, Maurice’s success on the donor circuit inspires jealousy among other victims’ groups. And here’s where trouble begins.

First, one of Maurice’s VIP donor trips to Auschwitz get interrupted by a rabble of New Age hippies who seek to include other ‘victims’ in the Holocaust genre. There’s the African-American holocaust, the Palestinian holocaust, the women’s holocaust, the American Indian holocaust, the Christian holocaust, the Muslim holocaust, the Gay and Lesbian holocaust, the Tibetan holocaust and any and all other holocausts, known or unknown.

Back in the States, the hippies go even further by occupying Maurice’s beloved museum and demanding inclusion of the ‘other’ holocausts. It’s a spectacle that draws crowds from all over to watch the tragedy unfold on 14th Street. Maurice is among the hostages stuck inside but Norman and Monty won’t let the police storm the museum because, as one of the occupiers explains, it would look bad to have “federal storm troopers come breaking into the United State Holocaust Memorial Museum of all places … and turn [it] into another Waco Holocaust.”

Nu, so what’s the point of all this?

Reich’s satire demonstrates the absurdity of the competition for victim status that appears to be vogue among liberal elites. As Cynthia Ozick points out in her praise of the book:

[I]t accuses the prevailing tone of American society, a cultish-ness cultivated from the top down—the cult of rivalrous victimization, celebrated among the humanities in all American universities, from women’s studies to black studies to postcolonial studies, from literature departments to history departments to Middle Eastern departments, all those braggart elitist realms where grievance and suffering are crowned with laurel.

Reich also succeeds in chastising the collective Jewish community for the intense fund-raising, the countless memorials and the accompanying donor-ego aggrandizement surrounding the memory of the Holocaust.

This is no simple task. When you venture into criticism of anything Holocaust-related, you risk backlash from the Jewish community. You can be seen as someone who wants to minimize the Holocaust in history. And with that being a common tactic among the Holocaust deniers, it qualifies you for an associate membership in their group. Even if you reject the deniers’ point of view, the deniers can still embrace your ideas and for many in the Jewish community that’s just as bad because you provided fodder for the enemy.

So that’s the risk Reich took. Undoubtedly, she’s already received letters from people who think Holocaust survivors are too sensitive a subject for satire. But, those readers miss Reich’s larger message about ‘victim-ness’ in American society. Of course the Holocaust is a sensitive subject but that’s precisely why something had to be said about the tainting of its legacy.

Thankfully, Reich has said it.

My Holocaust” is published by HarperCollins (326 pages, $24.95).

Jewish Literary Review, 22 may 2007

http://www.jewishliteraryreview.com/post/Review-of-Tova-Reich-My-Holocaust.aspx

THE UNKNOWN BOOK

Saturday, June 6th, 2009

The Fate of Author of “Fate”

By Roberta Strauss Feuerlicht

I am the unknown Jew. Just as there are monuments to the unknown soldier and the unknown political prisoner, there should be a monument to the unknown Jew. We are Jews who oppose Zionism, who deplore Israeli oppression and aggression, who fear that Judaism may not survive Israel. We are probably a majority of Jews, but no one knows this because we have been effectively intimidated and suppressed by the Zionist minority.

The degree of suppression is inconceivable in a democratic society. I wrote a book called The Fate of the Jews, which was published in August, 1983. It argues that Jewish ethics and Israeli power are incompatible; that Jewish obligations to love thy neighbor, do justice and love mercy, oppress not the stranger, are being obliterated by Israel; and that the Israelis are surviving, but not as Jews.

Attempts were made to bury the book even before publication. For example, a liberal magazine expressed interest in publishing an excerpt, the text of which apparently was given to a prominent liberal Jewish journalist. His reaction was vehement; the magazine changed its mind about the excerpt and the journalist wrote a personal letter to my agent trying to kill the book with one mighty blow. “It is a preposterous book,” he said, “easily the worst I’ve looked at in years.”

So much for Jewish liberalism. Shortly thereafter, Publishers Weekly, the bible of the publishing industry, offered a very different opinion in its prepublication review. “The book is an outcry right out of Jeremiah.” said the review. “Written with courage and clarity, Feuerlicht’s detailed analysis of what she sees as American Jewry’s embrace of a false god in the state of Israel is certain to place her book in the heart of a raging controversy.”

But I was not fated to be at the heart of a raging controversy, because you cannot hear silence. The publisher did not take out a single advertisement for the book. Many bookstores refused to carry it. In one major chain, where it had been ordered, it was on a list of books not to be reordered.

The least expensive way to promote a book is to put the author on television and radio. For a previous book on the Sacco-Vanzetti trial in the 1920′s, I was on 65 or 70 TV and radio shows in just four cities. For this more timely book on Jews and Israel—a story that is in the headlines almost every day—the publisher found no television and only eight minor radio shows in New York. Of the eight, two were cancelled and two that had been taped were not broadcast, at least not when they were scheduled.

Finally, I hired my own publicity person and though some shows did turn me down, I was booked on major TV and radio programs in Washington, Cleveland, Detroit, Boston, and Houston. I didn’t go any farther because I couldn’t afford to and because appearances cannot sell books that are not in bookstores.

I have written children’s books that received more attention than The Fate of the Jews. As far as I know, only three newspapers reviewed it, The Los Angeles Times, The Pittsburgh Press, and, under prolonged pressure, The Christian Science Monitor. The Washington Post praised the Sacco-Vanzetti book on the front page of its Sunday book review; The Fate of the Jews went unnoticed.

When all else failed, I told my story to several well known iconoclastic journalists. All were suitably indignant, all promised me their support, all were either voluntarily or involuntarily suppressed.

Jews are disturbed about Israel. I believe more of them would have read The Fate of the Jews if they knew it existed. Zionists feared the book because they were judged by Jewish standards and found wanting. They didn’t dare openly criticize or burn it because the noise or the smoke might have attracted attention. In the freest country in the world, with the aid and acquiescence of the freest press in the world, a zealous minority successfully suppressed dissent and stoned me to death with silence. The book is now out of print.

 Washington Report on the Middle east
American Educational Trust, 27 May 1985, p. 3

JEWISH PORNOGRAPHY

Saturday, June 6th, 2009

 

Jewish pornography questions the limits of assimilation.
by Joshua Cohen

 

A man gets drunk and lays down with his two virgin daughters. A man secures permission from his two wives to lay down with his two slave girls. A woman disguises herself as a whore and lays down with her father-in-law.

This is the original Jewish pornography, as found in the book of Genesis. But is it really Jewish Pornography? In typical Jewish fashion, the answer is yet another question: Would you masturbate to it?

Probably not. Why? The Tanakh—the Old Testament and the Jewish Scriptures—is full of incest and the taking of virgins. In a literature where the idea of “barely legal” has absolutely no meaning, scripture and pornography overlap more than you’d think.

But the Bible isn’t Jewish Porn. Philip Roth isn’t Jewish Porn, either. Al Goldstein isn’t Jewish Porn. Even Ron Jeremy—known to his proud mother as Ron Hyatt—isn’t Jewish Porn. Traci Lords—who would have been Nora Louise Kuzma at her bat mitzvah—is just another shaven screen starlet. She has nothing to do with Jewish Porn.

What of Playboy playmate Lindsey Vuolo? In the November 2001 issue, the 20-year-old Philadelphia-area co-ed identified herself as a Jew and included a photograph from her bat mitzvah. The media maydel became a joke for synagogue lobbies across America by inadvertently questioning the limits of assimilation in Jewish life. Playboy is not selling her religion, and neither is her religion selling magazines. Her tits are. Her ass is. Nobody’s jerking off to little Lindsey from the suburbs because she’s a Jewess, but because she’s hot.

JEwish Porn (JP) fetishizes Jewish women. In the Jew-run Vivid Video’s The Burning Bush… Hot, Jewish Babe Vivid, Sex Action, one can enjoy “4 Hrs. of Fiddling on the Roof!” Jeanna Fine, Sindee Cox, Melissa Monet, Nina Hartley (nee Hartman) and Alexandra Silk suck and fuck as in any film—the only difference is these girls are said to be Jewish.

But even this is a thin broth. For the real JP, head to the Web, where the pop-up windows accumulate thick like locusts. There you’ll find pornography about Jews made for Jews and their admirers to masturbate to, to enact the age-old sin of Onan, of the thirty-eighth chapter of Genesis.

In JP, as in other porn, large-breasted and well-tanned women pose and perform sexual acts. Except here, the women are Hebrews, recipients of the Law at Sinai, the women who sang with Miriam at the parting of the Red Sea, the women—brides and queens in religious imagery—who are metaphors for theShechinah, or Godhead, for the soul. At least that’s what they’re supposed to be.

The photos and movies emphasize the stereotype of heavy-breasted women with large noses, dark curly hair and unshaven genitals. They’re heavily made up and wear ostentatious jewelry—dangling amber necklaces and loud diamond rings. Their faces often twist into superior, snobbish sneers.

In some cases, these daughters of Sarah are screwed by uncircumcised men, and in bright-pink dialogue bubbles, they make much of how this religio-surgical fact would enrage their mothers. Their faux biographies profess a predilection for money. Consider the following website come-ons (inserting “[sic]” at will):

These babes are Pretty, Perky and Pareve
Young Yentas with big boobs
JAP’s getting down n’ dirty
Enough streaming video to make you PLOTZ
Rich New York chicks, raised in the lap of luxury, ready to feel a real man inside them.
Oy! Don’t tell their mommas what you see in here! 
These aren’t the kind of girls you’d invite over for passover, But I wouldn’t mind spending a high holy day with any of them.
Fresh from a summer on the Kabutz these pretty little Jewish Coeds are ready for a little action and it shows! If their Rabbi’s find out about this there would be more than a little Jewish guilt to dish out!

 

At the Jewish Twin Sister Incest website, twin Jewish sisters can be seen “Washing, Posing, Spanking, Undressing, Bondage, Master Bating.” All, it seems, without a trace of satire. The identical twins in question may be known to some New Yorkers—they’re Victoria and Marissa of the Sisters Grimm, the trash-rock band that appeared regularly at Coney Island High. Others may know them as Rocket and Leather from More Dirty Debutantes “88″ and other adult videos. In private, these nice Jewish girls—originally from Brooklyn—may smirk and giggle about their foray into porn, but there’s nary a wink on the site. They’re working the Jew angle hard, and make it clear that in order to see the goods, you must first sign up for Adult Check, the online porn industry’s standard pay system.

Does this contribute to anti-Semitism? Or is it just a convenient site for multi-fetishism? Where else can one find real twin Jewesses engaging in incestuous lesbianism with a touch of bondage and sadomasochism?

Rabbi Shmuley Boteach is the spiritual guru who wrote the bestselling Kosher Sex. He has an excellent reputa-
tion in matters both religious and secular and his specialty is sex, so he seemed like the logical guy to consult about Jewish Porn. When asked about JP, he responded that he was “strongly opposed to any such thing” and had no time to comment further on it.

I interviewed 11 rabbis, none of whom had any idea that Jewish Pornography even exists. When I explained JP to them, they requested that their names not be included in this article. My own rabbi was one of them. His only comment: “You worry about Jewish pornography when your people die in Israel?” My own mother was shocked: “Don’t people hate us enough?” Among my friends, the reactions were predictable. The ones who had heard of Jewish Porn shared their favorite sites with me, while those who hadn’t were surprised. “You mean something like that actually exists?” one female friend asked.

David, a good Jew, observed: “It’s a strange thing. It’s more funny than erotic. I laugh and then I jerk off.” But why does he choose it in the first place? Clues may be found in the Kabbalah, in which dualities of masculine and feminine are forever interpolated. Gershom Scholem, in Origins of Kabbalah, points out one of the most interesting dualities: the Double Sophia (represented ashokhmah), the bride and the daughter, one a “virgin of light” in the upper world of the pleroma. The other, lower Sophia “succumbed to the temptation of the hyle and fell from the pleroma into the lower worlds, where it is…in exile.”

The Upper Sophia is often referred to as the “Wisdom of God,” while the lower Sophia was known as the “Wisdom of Solomon”—or worldly knowledge. This is an interesting mirror of the Kabbalistic idea of Lilith and Eve. Lilith was the sinful temptress of Adam; she was the real first woman and she fell. She was replaced with Eve, a more innocent woman, whose “evil” was strictly an exterior matter—that famous piece of produce. Many Jewish men grow up assuming that they’ll fuck a Lilith and marry an Eve. Jewish Porn is the Lilith of the college Jew-boy.

JEwish Pornography is about Jewish women, and just as other specialty porn plays up stereotypes, so, too, does JP. Get beyond the JAP stereotypes (“Who says Jewish girls don’t give head?” asks more than one website), and you’ll find more subtle themes. For example, the modesty of the Orthodox.

On some websites, the women wear the single-female uniform of modern orthodoxy: ankle-length, dark-colored skirts and long-sleeved shirts, and sometimes wigs, or shaidels. This modesty is intended to render them more erotic than if they were naked. The Jewish idea of modesty, peeking through the mechitza of taboo, is related to another interesting subculture—Jewish submissives in the world of bondage and sadomasochism (BDSM). On one website, “m” writes: “as a Jewish female submissive I believe my worlds [Judaism and sex] still mesh quite well… Being and knowing I am submissive allows me to be more of me…and that is what being Jewish is about… For me, it is a pleasure and an honor to serve… And similar to Judaism, that is what BDSM is all about…respect.”

This literate website is part of JPEX, the Jewish Power Exchange, a website and mailing list owned by one Princess Laya, who offers this explanation: “When the Hebrews were asked by Hashem if they would accept the Torah, they responded, Na’aseh V’Nishma, we will hear and we will do. The ultimate form of submission is to be willing to do the bidding of one’s Master with trust before receiving instructions.”

Another recurring motif in JP is the idea of the Mikvah, the ritual bath, as it relates to a woman’s menstruation and the sacred purification process. One site suggests that a Mikvah is an excellent place to pick up Jew-girls. These aspects of Judaism are more than mere set pieces for masturbating. There is a deeper significance. If all male Jews died out, there would still be Jews, in a Talmudic sense. Jewish women are the hosts of the bloodline, the givers of the ethnicity. There are only more Jews because of Jewish women, so it’s not unnatural that they may be venerated and sexualized, admired as Jews first, women second. In consuming JP, are Jewish men driven by a fear of extinction?

From Upper West Side penthouses with views of the park to suburban living rooms, from hairy and bespectacled Jewish men to tanned, pre-rhinoplasty JAPs, Jewish Porn is a virtual homeland of neuroses, an Israel of the fetishized. One image that sticks in my head is a picture of Yarden Godowsky, one of the “Kosher Cuties” at cooldiggygirls.com who is “pretty, perk and pareve.” In her own words: “I was born in Russia and now live in Ashdod, Israel. The one universal in my travels is my love of big boobs. It’s great to have DD’s.”

She is pictured in what appears to be her Ashdod living room, crouching in a cutoff tank top and holding a hula hoop against patterned wallpaper. She has a boy’s haircut and lipstick as red as the first-plague Nile. She is a greenhorn, an immigrant, and this is her absorption. She is the classic intersection of laughter and seriousness in Jewish identity, updated for the new millennium.

JEwish Porn is hardly the only brand of religious smut on the market. Admirers of Catholic schoolgirls are legion, and Angry- White-Man-on-Muslim-Woman material has proliferated since the first Gulf War. The first has, for the most part, been stripped of its religious significance. They’re Catholic—so what? They’re being naughty—let’s hope they don’t tell Mother Superior. Most erotic is the discipline aspect and the recollection of childhood exploration. The second, anti-Muslim porn, is less about religion than it is the embodiment of directionless hate in the form of sexual violence. It’s about ripping off that burka to see what’s underneath. It’s about the myth of the Manifest White Dick exploring and Christianizing the heathens in Holy scrotum-water.

Likewise, Jewish Porn is not religious pornography. Despite the occasional use of ritual objects in the acts of sodomy, this is anethnic pornography. It fetishizes a small yet vital segment of the American populace. Catholic schoolgirls wait at their bus stop, skipping rope and doing whatever it is that Catholic schoolgirls do—a man watches from his wood-paneled sedan and masturbates. On the opposite corner, Jewish school girls wait for their bus to day school, doing whatever it is that Jewish girls do. They, too, have their masturbating man in the wood-paneled sedan.

I was wrong to ask the rabbis why JP exists. It exists because it exists. If goyim in Uncircumcised, Oklahoma can eat bagels and knishes and drink black cherry soda, then Jews have the right to indulge in something outside their Kollective Ken. If they can do it, we can do it.

The average JP consumer is my friend David who laughs and then jerks off. Harmless entertainment. Let him have his Lilith, and let the goyim have their JAP fantasies. In the larger scheme, full split shots of “hairy Hebraic vaginas” are hardly small steps to the railcars. Or are they?

At the extreme end of Jewish Porn, the terror of the concentration camps is re-enacted for sexual gratification. In Holocaust Porn, Jewish women are shown squatting and defecating in packed trains. They are shown having their heads shaved. They are emaciated, with their ribs poking out. They are incinerated in open ovens. They are gassed. They are sodomized with severed limbs, sometimes their own limbs.

One can find staged photographs of a naked and shivering woman under a showerhead in a tiled hygienic facility. I have seen photos of a man dressed as a stormtrooper emptying a tank labeled “Gasoline” into a woman’s mouth. The woman holds the funnel and masturbates the Nazi with her right hand. These photos are grainy black-and-whites, yet are clearly contemporary. And here things get dirty: The Holocaust Porn industry is based in Israel. The films are mostly made by Israelis, and they are also mostly purchased by Israelis. The actresses are overwhelmingly Israeli-Russian immigrants.

Is Israeli involvement in Holocaust Porn a sick manifestation of an addiction to persecution? Is it a reaction to assimilation—or a product of it? Is it the blackest form of satire? How different are these re-enactments from those rare bits of genuine Holocaust footage passed around for erotic consumption? In an essay on Holocaust Porn, Andrea Dworkin writes that the victims have become the victimizers. That’s not quite the point: the victims have become the victimizers while remaining the victims.

The level of victimization found in more mainstream forms of JP is open to debate. Some, like Dworkin, herself from a family of survivors, argue that it is, if not a direct line, at least a slippery slope. Maybe. But one thing is sure: Anyone who stars in Holocaust Porn, or directs it or does editing or contributes in any way in its production or facilitates its distribution, or has masturbated to it or watched it, or snickered after overhearing a fleeting reference at the urinals in the synagogue—all of these people are going to hell, gehinnon, that mythic valley outside of Jerusalem’s walls.

New York Press — Volume 16, Issue 10  -  3/5/2003

CARLOS AND THE ANTI ZIONIST PARTY

Wednesday, June 3rd, 2009

By Benjamin Weinthal

 The imprisoned global terrorist Ilich Ramirez Sanchez – better known as the notorious Carlos the Jackal – issued on Monday a campaign endorsement of the Anti-Zionist Party by telephone hookup from the French prison Poissy to 300 supporters in Paris. The anti-Israel party is fielding candidates in the June 7 elections for the European Parliament.

Carlos expressed his “solidarity” with the views of the head of the Anti-Zionist Party, French comedian Dieudonné Mbala Mbala. The Anti-Zionist Party platform, calls for an end to “Zionist interference in the nation’s public affairs,” and a rebuke of “politicians who apologize for Zionism.”  The radical anti-Israeli party demands that France “free our state, our government, our institutions from the possession and pressure of Zionist organizations; eradicate all forms of Zionism in the nation” and “prevent enterprises and institutions from contributing to the war efforts of a foreign nation, which does not respect International Law.”

Carlos and Dieudonné share a hatred of the Jewish state. Carlos, who joined the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine in 1970, is serving a life sentence in the Poissy prison near Paris for a triple murder in 1975. He termed Israel “the first terrorist state in history” at his sentencing hearing in 1997 and blamed Israel for framing him in the assassination of two French intelligence agents and a Lebanese informant. Carlos is thought to be the mastermind behind the Palestinian terrorist group Black September murder of 11 Israeli athletes at the Munich Olympic Games in 1972, [They were in fact shot by the German Security forces] as well as of a grenade attack on an Israeli bank in the United Kingdom.

French courts have fined Dieudonné on five occasions for anti-Semitic statements. He called the Holocaust “memorial pornography” and last December he awarded the French Holocaust denier Robert Faurisson, a prize for “non-conformity and impertinence.” Dieudonné had a performer dressed up as a concentration camp prisoner deliver the award to Faurisson.

With a view toward building, according to Dieudonné, “the only anti-Zionist movement” in France, his party has attracted a “Who’s Who” of anti-Semitic candidates from across the French political spectrum. [This is a typical lie and calumny spread by the press]. Among Dieudonné’s new political bedfellows is the extreme right-wing party of Jean-Marie Le Pen. Alain Soral, an ex-communist who served as an advisor to Le Pen, is running as a candidate for the Anti-Zionist Party. [Many others coming from the Left jumped onboard.] Le Pen, who described the Nazi death camps as “a detail of history,” is purportedly the godfather of Dieudonné’s daughter. [This wa a silly joke.]

Another Anti-Zionist candidate is Yahia Gouasmi, head of the Zahra Center, which is affiliated [= politically close to]  with Hizbullah and the Islamic Republic of Iran. Gouasmi said in late May the Zionists in France control “the media, the education of our children and our government,” in order to serve “Israeli interests.”

Ginette Skandrani, a former French Green Party member [founder] , is also running with the rabidly anti-Israel party. She was tossed out of the Green Party for denying the Holocaust [another lie]. 

Claude Guéant, the general secretary to French President Nicolas Sarkozy, told the France Radio J [J=Jewish] program that one should consider banning the “open anti-Semitism” of the Anti-Zionist Party. [But he miserably failed to find a good reason.] The French National Bureau of Vigilance Against Anti-Semitism [= Jewish Thought Police] asked the Interior Ministry to prohibit the party’s EU campaign. But Rachida Dati, France’s justice minister, said the ministry found no basis to legally ban the party. ”If the goal of this party would be to conduct an anti-Semitic and racist discourse, he [Dieudonné ] would not have been allowed to run in the election,” Dati said. [Dati is a staunch Zionist propagandist]

 Jerusalem Post  June 4, 2009

http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1244034990738&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull

DEFENDING ZIONISM — DEFENDING THE INDEFENSIBLE

Wednesday, June 3rd, 2009

by Stephen Lendman

 This article responds to a March 15 Los Angeles Times Judea Pearl one headlined: “Is anti-Zionism hate?” Pearl teaches computer science at UCLA, is the father of slain journalist[-spy]  Daniel Pearl, and president of the Daniel Pearl Foundation. It was “formed….to continue Danny’s mission and to address the root causes of this tragedy in the spirit” of the man it represents, including “uncompromised objectivity and integrity….and respect for people of all cultures….” 

Some of its honorary board member belie this purpose:

– former president Bill Clinton, an unindicted war criminal and backer of neoliberal plunder;
– Elie Wiesel, a shameless self-promoter, “Holocaust” exploiter, and apologist for the most outrageous Israeli crimes;
– Jordan’s Queen Noor, wife of King Abdullah II, who, like his father Hussein, rules with dictatorial police state powers; and
– Christiane Amanpour and Ted Koppel, two notables in the corporate media who never let facts conflict with their views and support for the powerful.

Pearl calls anti-Zionism “hate more dangerous than anti-Semitism, threatening lives and peace in the Middle East.” Zionism is precisely the opposite as numerous Jewish writers, including this one, have addressed. In his book Overcoming Zionism, Joel Kovel explained how it fosters “imperialist expansion and militarism (with) signs of the fascist malignancy;” that it turned Israel “into a machine for the manufacture of human rights abuses” led by terrorists posing as democrats. Kovel’s book and his work got him fired from the Bard College faculty effective July 1 when his current contract expires – for daring to criticize Israel, its Zionist ideology, state-sponsored terror, and decades of lawlessness and egregious behavior.

Kovel expressed outrage that institutions like Bard aren’t bothered; that they grant Israel impunity, suppress dissent, then marginalize, punish, and remove the “heretics,” ones like Kovel who honorably and courageously write truths. Pearl railed about a UCLA Center for Near East Studies symposium invitation to “four longtime Israel bashers” so they could attack Zionism’s legitimacy and “its vision of a two-state solution….” — a scheme to consign Palestinians to isolated cantons and steal their most valuable land.

He equates legitimate Israeli criticism and anti-Zionism with “criminaliz(ing) Israel’s existence, distort(ing) its motives and malign(ing) its character, its birth, even its conception.” He cites “Jewish leaders (condemning) this hate-fest as a dangerous invitation to anti-Semitic hysteria” even though one has nothing to do with the other and conflating them masks the real issue –Zionism’s corrosive effects and the myths on which it’s based.

Ones Pearl ignores in stating “Anti-Zionism rejects the very notion that Jews are a nation — a collective bonded by a common history — and, accordingly denies Jews the right to self-determination in their historical birthplace. It seeks the dismantling of the Jewish nation-state: Israel, (what it) ‘grants’ to other historically bonded collectives (e.g. French, Spanish, Palestinians), the right to nationhood….”

Pearl can’t accept the hard facts that Tel Aviv University Professor Shlomo Sand documented in his important 2008 book When and How Was the Jewish People Invented? It exposes biblical nonsense comprising core Zionist beliefs about Jews:

 – that ancient Romans expelled them;
– their exodus from Egypt, then left to wander the earth rootless;
– enslaved, oppressed, and tormented for centuries; and
– the myth that God bestowed a “Greater Israel” for Jews alone — “A land without people for a people without land.”

 According to Israeli journalist Tom Segev and others: 

– there never was a Jewish people, just a Jewish religion;
– there was no exile, therefore no return, and much of the Jewish Diaspora was voluntary; and
– the story was a Zionist invention, a conspiracy to justify a future Jewish state, and now vilify Palestinian self-determination as a plot to destroy it.

 With regard to other “bonded collectives,” France, Spain, America and other states are nationalities, not religions. Israel is a Jewish state with rights for Jews alone. They matter. Others don’t, and therein lies the difference. Palestinians, in contrast, are occupied, impoverished, oppressed, driven from their land, vilified for being Muslims, and victimized by slow-motion genocide to destroy them and any hope for self-determination.

 ”Are Jews a nation,” asks Pearl? “Some philosophers would argue Jews are a nation first and religion second.” He cites the usual mythology:

 – the Exodus and return to the “promised land before they received the Torah at Mt. Sinai;”
– “the unshaken conviction in their eventual repatriation to (their) birthplace (since) the Roman expulsion;” and
– their “shared history, not religion (as) the primary uniting force behind the secular, multiethnic society of Israel” – favoring Jews alone in a quasi secular/religious state where practicing another one is dangerous.

 The “Jewish identity today feed(s) on Jewish history (more precisely folklore and myths) and its natural derivatives -

 – the state of Israel” despite its illegitimate birth and mythological roots;
– “its struggle for survival” in spite of being the world’s fourth most powerful military, nuclear-armed; with no enemies except the ones it makes; and having a history of aggressive wars; violence over conciliation; confrontation, not diplomacy; and claiming self-defense as justification when there is none;
– “its cultural and scientific achievements,” much of the latter involving militarism and hard line security; and
– “its relentless drive for peace.”

 Pearl like most others can’t accept the fact that Israel disdains peace, thrives on violence, and needs it as justification. The very notion of peace and conflict resolution terrifies it. What prime minister Yitzhak Shamir once admitted about Israel’s 1982 Lebanon war — that there was “terrible danger….not so much a military one as a political one” so a pretext was invented to attack when no threat or justification existed.

It took 18,000 lives and left South Lebanon occupied until Israel Defense Forces withdrew in May 2000, except for the 25 square km Shebaa Farms area illegally retained to this day.

Yet Pearl insists that “anti-Zionism targets the most vulnerable part of the Jewish people, namely, the Jewish population of Israel, whose physical safety and personal dignity depend crucially on maintaining Israel’s sovereignty. Put bluntly, the anti-Zionist ‘plan’ to do away with Israel condemns 5.5 million human beings, mostly refugees or children of refugees, to eternal defenselessness in a region where genocidal designs are not uncommon.”

He adds that “anti-Zionist rhetoric (shows) academic sophistication and social acceptance in certain extreme yet vocal circles. (It’s also) a stab in the back to the Israeli peace camp (and) gives credence (to) the hidden agenda of every Palestinian (for) the eventual elimination of Israel.”

Now some facts misrepresented, distorted, or unstated by Pearl and other like-minded apologists: 

– There never was nor is there now an “Israeli peace camp,” as explained above.
– Israel’s sovereignty isn’t the issue. It exists, is accepted, and anti-Zionists don’t dispute it. Further, since at least the late 1980s, Palestinian leaders (including Arafat and Hamas) have been willing to extend recognition. But Israel rejects all peace and reconciliation overtures, yet the dominant media and Zionists won’t mention it.
– Palestinians and other Arabs don’t target Israel and haven’t since the 1973 war. However, they justifiably defend themselves when attacked as international law allows.
– Anti-Zionists, like this writer, have no plan or desire to destroy Israel, harm its people, or render them defenseless. Demanded, however, is that Israel behave, act civilized, practice the democracy it preaches, observe international and its own laws, and be held fully accountable when it doesn’t, including its leaders for their crimes of war and against humanity to deter future ones from committing similar violations.
– Israel alone menaces Palestinians and other regional states, including Lebanon, Syria, and Iran. Those nations, nor any others, threaten Israel, yet again media and Zionist propaganda say otherwise.
– Zionist ideology is extremist, undemocratic, and hateful. It claims Jewish supremacy, specialness, and uniqueness – God’s “chosen people.” It harms Jews and non-Jews alike. Former Israeli scholar, critic, and life-long human rights activist, Israel Shahak (1933 – 2001), explained the dangers of Jewish chauvinism, religious fanaticism, and its influence on America’s polity.

He called the notion of self-hating Jews “nonsensical” and explained the definition of a Jew: ….”if either their mother, grandmother, great-grandmother (or) great-great-grandmother were Jewesses by religion; or if the person (converted) to Judaism in a way satisfactory to the Israeli authorities, and on condition that the person has not converted from Judaism to another religion.” According to the Talmud and post-Talmudic rabbinic law, “conversion (must be) performed by authorized rabbis in a proper manner.” For females, it entails an outlandish ritual – “their inspection by three rabbis while naked in a ‘bath of purification’ ” to confirm it.

Shahak wrote extensively on how Israel discriminates in favor of Jews in most every aspect of life, including the three he called most important – “residency rights, the right to work (and to have) equality before the law.”

Zionist ideology demeans non-Jews and denies them equal rights in Israel. A body of law enforces it – to legally discriminate against non-Jewish Israeli citizens (for their religion) and Palestinians in the Territories, something unimaginable in all developed states and most others on every continent.

Shahak stated: “The obvious intention of such discriminatory measures is to decrease the number of non-Jewish citizens of Israel (to affirm its existence as a) ‘Jewish’ state” quite hostile to and demeaning of other religious faiths.

This is the Zionist message and why growing numbers of Jews and many others oppose it. Supporting Zionism is repugnant, indefensible, and equivalent to defending cancer, a malignancy relentlessly destroying its host. It must be exposed, denounced, and once and for all expunged from the body politic. A CIA study suggested the alternative – that beyond 20 years, Israel won’t survive in its present form.

The Agency predicts “an inexorable movement away from a two-state to a one-state solution, as the most viable model based on democratic principles of full equality that sheds the looming specter of colonial Apartheid while allowing for the return of the 1947/1948 and 1967 (Palestinian) refugees. The latter (is) the precondition for sustainable peace in the region.”

According to international lawyer Franklin Lamb, “the handwriting….is on the wall….history will reject the colonial enterprise sooner or later.”

The report also predicts the return of all Palestinian refugees to their homeland and the exodus of two million Israeli Jews to America in the next 15 years. They’re fed up and want to leave. Omitted from the report, or at least unrevealed, is that short of an equitable resolution to the long-standing Palestinian conflict, Israel eventually will destroy itself. Nations that live by the sword, die by it, and Israel is no exception.

The alternative is peace and reconciliation, something Israel flatly rejects. Unless that changes, its very existence is at stake, what history teaches but Israel has yet to learn.

 

Stephen Lendman is a Research Associate of the Centre for Research on Globalization. He lives in Chicago and can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net. Also visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com and listen to The Global Research News Hour on RepublicBroadcasting.org Monday – Friday at 10AM US Central time for cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on world and national issues. All programs are archived for easy listening.

 

 http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=12928

March 30, 2009

 

 

ISRAELI ATOMIC INDUSTRY

Tuesday, June 2nd, 2009

Tal Rabinovsky, YNet

Leftist Israeli website claims to expose nuclear secrets published by foreign sources 

July 10, 2008

 Are Israel’s nuke secrets available online? The Armageddon <http://www.armagedon.org.il/> website claims to sport vast amounts of information about Israel’s nuclear program and its manufacturing and storage facilities, as published by various foreign sources.   The site is the brainchild of a large group of Israeli intellectuals, journalists and philosophers affiliated with an Israeli group advocating a Middle East free of atomic, biological, and chemical weapons; the organization says Knesset Member Dov Khenin (Hadash) is among its supporters. According to the website’s owners, the site is registered on an Israeli domain and is hosted on Australian-based servers. Armageddon’s owners claim to be the proprietors of a second domain –armagedonz.org ?which they can use in case the Military Censor tries to take it off the air. The details of the second domain’s owner are kept confidential –unlike those of the Israeli domain owner. The group behind the website, backed by several organizations that oppose the distribution of weapons of mass destruction, decided that the topic of WMDs is not given its appropriate place in public debate and that its increasingly growing urgency in the Middle East calls for something to be done.   

‘Website not illegal’

According to the website, the venture is sponsored by British group CND <http://www.cnduk.org/> – the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament, and found its Australian host with the assistance of Enzyme <http://www.enzyme.org.nz/> – a New-Zealand group that supports various progressive groups.   Gideon Spiro, a journalist and one of the site’s contributing editors, told Ynet that “none of the information on the site is confidential, so we’re not breaking the law. We simply think that when it comes to the nuclear program, the public was brainwashed by the government and doesn’t have any credible information.”   MK Dov Khenin, rumored to be one of the site’s supporters, denied Wednesday ever being approached by the site’s editors: “I don’t know the site so I can’t relate to it. I’m an outspoken advocate for holding a debate on the nuclear (program) in both the political and public arenas. I believe that the longer these things get put off, the more difficult situation Israel <http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3284752,00.html> may find itself in. I welcome any debate on the subject.”   Israel, he added, has an honest interest in disarming the Middle East of any nuclear weapons. “One of our main needs is to demilitarize the region, Iran included. I think this should be one of the pivotal points in Israel’s defense and foreign policy.”   Spiro, on the other hand, is adamant about the fact the Khenin was indeed approached: “I spoke with him and got his consent to put his name on the site. Ideologically speaking, he opposes nuclear weapons, as does any environmentalist. The Hadash platform has a clause objecting to Israel having nuclear weapons. He must be committed to the idea.” Armageddon is not the only website detailing information about Israel’s supposed nuclear capabilities: Surfing the internet for such information results in numerous websites that offer information about top secret units, tactical weapons and strategic measures held by Israel. The majority of information, however, is not available in Hebrew.   The IDF Spokesperson’s Unit offered the following response: “The Military Censor is familiar with the website and is in the process of studying its content; it will make its decision in due time, regardless of the authenticity of the material posted on the website.” Niv Lillian contributed to this report. 

 

:: Article nr. 45597 sent on 10-jul-2008 21:58 ECT

 www.uruknet.info?p=45597 <http://www.uruknet.info/?p=45597> 

 

Link: www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3566189,00.html <http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3566189,00.html>

One year later, this is still valid.

ARMEMENT •  Les secrets du nucléaire israélien divulgués sur Internet

http://www.courrierinternational.com/article.asp?obj_id=87661

“Le site Armageddon soutient qu’il donne en ligne [en hébreu] de nombreuses informations sur le programme nucléaire israélien, ses sites de production et de stockage”, rapporte Yediot Aharonot. A l’origine de ce site se trouve un groupe d’intellectuels, de journalistes et de philosophes israéliens affilié à un groupe militant pour “un Moyen-Orient sans armes nucléaires, chimiques et biologiques”, précise le quotidien israélien. “Selon ce groupe, soutenu par de nombreuses organisations opposées à la prolifération des armes de destruction massive, le problème posé par ces armes n’a pas la place qu’il mérite dans le débat public alors qu’il est urgent de faire quelque chose à ce sujet au Moyen-Orient.” ”Le projet est sponsorisé par le groupe britannique CND (Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament) et le site, dont le nom de domaine est enregistré en Israël, est hébergé par un fournisseur d’accès australien lui-même assisté par Enzyme, un groupe néo-zélandais qui soutient divers groupes progressistes”, détaille Yediot Aharonot. Selon Gideon Spiro, un journaliste qui collabore à ce site, “aucune des informations publiées sur le site n’est confidentielle ; il n’y a donc aucune entrave à la loi. Seulement, quand il s’agit du programme nucléaire, le public est soumis à un lavage de cerveau par le gouvernement et ne possède de ce fait aucune information crédible.” Ainsi, Armageddon n’est pas le seul site d’information sur les capacités nucléaires d’Israël. “Les sites abordant ce sujet sur la Toile seraient même assez nombreux. Mais la majorité des informations n’est pas disponible en hébreu.”