Archive for April, 2009

« Older Entries

TEN YEARS’ JEWISH ATTEMPT TO SILENCE INTERNET

Sunday, April 26th, 2009

 B’NAI BRITH URGES INTERNET CENSORSHIP TO SILENCE HOLOCAUST DEBATE 

Re: International Symposium on Hate on the InterNet (Invitational) 
March 21-23, 1999, Toronto 
“HATE ON THE INTERNET”http://www.bnaibrith.ca/league/hoti-1a.htm (BROKEN LINK)

Karen R. Mock and Lisa Armony

The Internet is the world’s fastest growing means of telecommunications. Comprised of individual computers, servers, and the telephone lines that link them, the Internet connects people across the globe, allowing them to instantly share thoughts and ideas in ways never before possible. Its global reach and relative ease of use make the Internet a unique, highly effective tool for the promotion of human rights, as unprecedented audiences, previously unexposed to human rights education can gain access to valuable information. Unfortunately, the very mechanisms that make the Internet an exciting educational tool also render it a dangerous, albeit efficient means of promoting hatred against racial and religious minorities. In fact, hate mongers were among the first to realize the tremendous power of the Internet to spread their messages. As a result, the computer is replacing conventional modes of communication as the dominant conveyor of hate propaganda.

The kinds of hate found on the Internet include expressions of hostility to “civil rights types” and “mud people” (the neo-Nazi term for non-whites and non-Christians), along with condemnation of race mixing, and page after page of antisemitic tracts, the majority of which deny that the Holocaust took place and promote conspiracy theories and other age-old antisemitic canards. Among the most virulent established websites are Canada’s Heritage Front, Ernst Zundel’s “Zundelsite,” Tom Metzger’s White Aryan Resistance (WAR), Aryan Nations, the Ku Klux Klan, Radio Islam, the Committee for the Open Debate of the Holocaust Story, and the National Alliance, arguably the most openly Nazi organization on the continent.

A recent report of the Simon Wiesenthal Centre identified over 600 hate sites worldwide, a 100% increase from last year. In Canada, approximately 150 people are thought to spend their time posting hate propaganda. Although hate mongers represent only a tiny proportion of the total Internet population, their ability to reach the estimated 50 million Internet users worldwide gives them a voice that far outweighs their numbers. Moreover, because the Internet is oblivious to international borders, material prohibited by Canadian law flows freely and unchallenged both into and out of this country. As a result, the media has reacted enthusiastically, providing a near-continuous flow of stories relating to hate and pornography on the Internet; and human rights and anti-racist organizations have voiced serious concern. Political reaction has been predictably vocal, and calls have been made for legislation to regulate the net, as well as to apply existing laws to Internet offenders.

 To Regulate the Net…or Not?

Questions of whether and how to legislate the Internet have been the subject of heated debate. Civil libertarians describe any attempts to regulate the Internet as censorship and an invasion of privacy, while some technologists claim that all such attempts are futile and that regulatory laws are virtually unenforceable. Nonetheless, several national and international covenants and declarations, including the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, the Criminal Code of Canada, the Canadian Human Rights Code, the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights, the International Convention Against All Forms of Racial Discrimination, and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights recognize the need to balance people’s freedom of expression with their right to be free from hate targeted against them.

Germany is the first country to try to patrol the information highway. In June 1997, the German parliament passed the first comprehensive national Internet law that sets out the rules for protecting confidentiality of personal data. The new law prescribes responsibilities for pornography and other objectionable material (e.g. Nazi propaganda, Holocaust denial), as well as granting licenses for “digital signatures,” electronic codes that are supposed to make commercial transactions on the Internet both secure and confidential. In spite of the objections by many Americans, who balk at anything resembling a violation of free speech and expression, German officials are unapologetic. According to the law’s sponsor, Jurgen Ruttgers, Minister of Education and Technology:

It’s a liberal law that has nothing to do with censorship but clearly sets the conditions for what a provider can and cannot do. The Internet is a means to transport and distribute knowledge…just as the highways, there needs to be guidelines for both kinds of traffic.

Germany has also indicted Felix Somm, managing director of CompuServe Germany, for failure to prevent the dissemination of three types of illegal material: child pornography and violent sex; computer games using images of Hitler, swastikas and other Nazi graphics; and a computer game with excessive violence beyond the standards set by Germany’s Youth Protection Authority. In addition, German legislators have recently enacted the Information and Communication Services Law which, under some circumstances, places responsibility for illegal content on Internet Service Providers.

 Self Regulation

In the past few years, Internet Service Providers (ISPs) have entered the debate over how to control the spread of illegal and harmful material on the net. ISPs in several countries have formed industry associations in an attempt to establish codes of conduct, or at least to develop a common approach to the regulatory issues raised. For example, the Canadian Association of Internet Providers (CAIP) Code of Conduct maintains that its members will not knowingly host illegal content, and that they will make a reasonable effort to investigate legitimate complaints about illegal content or network abuse and will take appropriate action. The Code of Practice of the Internet Service Providers Association (ISPA) of the U.K., which was originally voluntary but became mandatory for members in 1997, states that members “shall use their reasonable endeavours to ensure…service and promotional material do not contain material inciting violence, sadism, cruelty or racial hatred.” In 1997, the European Internet Services Providers Association (EuroISPA) was established with seven member service provider associations, representing over 400 ISPs across the European Union. Its stated goals include “to promote self-regulation and to influence the regulatory process on behalf of the Internet industry.” In addition, there have also been initiatives to set up “watchdog” groups to monitor illegal material on the Internet. In some cases, where specific organizations have not been established, human rights NGOs have taken on this task.

Human Rights Test Case

In Canada, a Human Rights Tribunal is currently underway against Ernst Zundel and the “Zundelsite”, a website replete with Holocaust denial and hateful diatribes against Jews and other minority groups. In this case, the complainants, Sabina Citron and the Toronto Mayor’s Committee on Community and Race Relations, allege that the respondent has engaged in a discriminatory practice on the grounds of race, religion and national or ethnic origin in a matter related to the usage of a telecommunication undertaking. The three main issues that have been raised at the hearing are:

a) is the Internet a “telephonic device” within Section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act so as to give the Tribunal jurisdiction? 
b) does Zundel control the California-based Zundelsite? and 
c) does the content of the Zundelsite promote hatred?

The site is said to be operated by Ingrid Rimland in San Diego in an attempt to circumvent the Canadian hate laws (Sections 318-320 of the Criminal Code). However, it appears clear that she gets her marching orders directly from Zundel. So far, the jurisdiction of the Human Rights Commission has been upheld by the Federal Court because the applicable section of the code refers to the use of telephonic transmissions, and e-mail and the Internet utilize telephone wires. The Tribunal will continue in the fall of 1998 and likely into 1999. Regardless of the results, the Zundel case promises to be precedent setting in the struggle to come to terms with the Internet.

Using All the Available Tools to Counter Hate

As the Zundel case continues, so too do international deliberations on whether or not (and if so, how) to regulate the Internet. These questions were the main thrust of B’nai Brith Canada’s International Symposium on Hate on the Internet, held in September, 1997 in Toronto. Over 100 Canadian and international government and police officials and experts in the fields of law, legislation, human rights, technology and education convened to explore the problem of hate on the Internet from various philosophical perspectives and professional approaches. The recommendations of the symposium were designed to counter the growing problem of hate on the Internet and to assist in national and international policy development. The recommendations dealt with four substantive areas: legal/legislative regulatory measures; voluntary non-regulatory measures; the role of police; and educational/pro-active initiatives (See Appendix I for the complete list of recommendations). Among the key recommendations were the application to the Internet of existing laws and international standards pertaining to hate, the establishment of voluntary codes of conduct by ISPs, and greater educational initiatives to instruct young people on how to recognize hate and Holocaust denial, with greater emphasis on anti-racism education and training than presently exists.

Despite good intentions by some governments and international institutions, the global nature of the Internet and the ability to create mirror sites make the application of existing laws to the Internet difficult if not impossible. How then are we to deal with the problem of millions of people being exposed to virulent antisemitism and hate propaganda at the flick of the switch on their computers? The answer is no different from the approach we continuously advocate to counter the more traditional tactics of the hate mongers in this country.

A coordinated effort on several fronts, using all resources available, is the most effective way to ensure the struggle against hate will be won in Canada. This work must be about protection, partnerships and prevention. In order to accomplish this, our three most powerful tools are the law, community action and education. Although hate propaganda (the promotion of hatred against identifiable groups) has been a criminal offense in Canada since 1970, the application of the law with regard to the Internet presents complex problems, primarily over jurisdiction issues in trying to contain an activity that defies borders. Yet we must attempt to implement our laws and codes wherever they are applicable.

Ultimately the battle against racism and hate on the Internet will be won through increased efforts to incorporate Holocaust education, multiculturalism, anti-racist, and human rights education in our schools. Computer literacy courses, indeed most of our courses, need to be supplemented by strategies to recognize lies and propaganda, in spite of how credible the purveyors of hate may try to make them appear, so that when our youth stumble across such material, in whatever form, they will reject it. In Canada, websites such as the Canadian Human Rights Commission (that includes the new interactive game Countering the Hydra of Hate), B’nai Brith Canada (including the League for Human Rights, and Holocaust and Hope), Artists Against Racism, and the Nizkor Project (with thousands of pages of historical facts on the Holocaust to counter Holocaust deniers) demonstrate that meticulous research and dedicated cooperation can provide the educational impact needed to confront hate on the Internet.

Dr. Karen Mock is National Director of the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada. 
Lisa Armony is National Director of the Institute for International Affairs of B’nai Brith Canada

 http://www.public-action.com/SkyWriter/ZOA/Z_bbuic.html

[10 years later, Zundel is in jail in Germany. For another year. Revisionist website flourish on the Internet, in spite of more Jewish-inspired censorchip laws. The traditional enemies of freedom take beating after beating. ]

Tags:
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

PULLULATING JEWISH SPIES IN WASHINGTON

Sunday, April 26th, 2009

THE SAMSON GAMBIT

Why Steve Rosen is suing AIPAC

by Grant Smith, April 08, 2009

In August 2005, Steve Rosen, fellow AIPAC employee Keith Weissman, and the Pentagon’s Col. Lawrence Franklin were indicted under the Espionage Act for allegedly trafficking classified U.S. national defense information in the interest of provoking a stronger U.S. posture toward Israel’s arch nemesis, Iran. Franklin has since pled guilty and received a prison sentence and fine. Franklin has not reported to prison, since he is cooperating with U.S. prosecutors and ready to testify when the criminal trial of Rosen and Weissman – repeatedly delayed by sophisticated defense team legal maneuvers – finally commences on May 27.

In his civil lawsuit against AIPAC Rosen maintains both his immunity from the Espionage Act and right to obtain tightly held government information for effective lobbying and public relations on behalf of Israel:

“To be effective, organizations engaged in advocacy in the field of foreign policy need to have earlier and more detailed information about policy developments inside the government and diplomatic issues with other countries than is normally available to or needed by the wider public. … Agencies of the government sometimes choose to provide such additional information about policy and diplomatic issues to these outside interest groups in order to win support for what they are doing among important domestic constituencies and to send messages to select target audiences.”

One surprising inside glimpse of AIPAC information flow in Rosen’s complaint reveals how special relationships cultivated with U.S. government officials yielded periodic harvests of tightly held information. This bounty was then internally circulated and funneled to outside constituencies at the discretion of AIPAC’s mirror bureaucracy of self-appointed declassification agents:

“To control the flow of such information, government agencies in the field of foreign policy have designated individuals with the authority to determine and differentiate which information disclosures would be harmful to the United States, and which disclosures would benefit the United States through the work of their agencies and would not be harmful to the United States. To maintain liaison with the authorized agency officials who at times are willing to provide such information, organizations like AIPAC have designated officials of their own who have the requisite expertise and relationships to deal with government foreign policy agencies. At AIPAC, Steve Rosen was one of the principal officials who, along with Executive Director Howard Kohr and a few other individuals, were expected to maintain relationships with such agencies, receive such information, and share it with AIPAC Board of Directors and its Senior Staff for possible further distribution. AIPAC, and those defendants who were AIPAC officials and/or members of its Board of Directors, knew that Mr. Rosen and others at AIPAC were receiving such information and expected that they would share it with them.”

More damning to AIPAC, Rosen states unequivocally that other top AIPAC officials not only knew what he was doing, but also received classified information for which they both praised and financially rewarded Rosen and others handling and channeling classified information:

“Mr. Rosen was highly successful in his job, and was regularly praised and generously rewarded by AIPAC’s Executive Director, its President, and its Board of Directors, including by those named as defendants herein who are and/or who were in those positions, for obtaining and sharing such information as described in paragraph no. 18 above. Indeed at the time it was shared with them, AIPAC’s Executive Director, its President, and its Board of Directors including those named as defendants herein who are and/or were in those positions, were well aware of the nature of the information obtained by Mr. Rosen as described in paragraph no. 18 above. Being so aware, they would often share that same information with others outside of AIPAC, particularly valuing Mr. Rosen for his ability to provide them with such information. In fact, AIPAC’s Executive Director, its President, and its Board of Directors, including by those named as defendants herein who are and/or who were in those positions as well as others of AIPAC’s staff, also obtained and shared with each other, and with others outside of AIPAC, such information as described in paragraph no. 18 above, and did so on a regular basis quite apart from the information obtained and shared with them by Mr. Rosen.”

Curiously, Steve Rosen is not the only former AIPAC staffer suddenly surfacing to confront AIPAC. Another even intimates that AIPAC is a hotbed for activities of questionable legality. Former AIPAC chief lobbyist Douglas Bloomfield characterized AIPAC not as a classified information bazaar, but rather as a covert foreign agent for Israeli governments bent on thwarting U.S. brokered peace deals. While simultaneously forecasting the imminent demise of the government’s criminal prosecution against Weissman and Rosen, Bloomfield points to insider forces slowly arraying highly damaging information against AIPAC:

“In cutting loose the pair, AIPAC insisted it had no idea what they were doing. Not so, say insiders, former colleagues, sources close to the defense, and others familiar with the organization.

“One of the topics AIPAC won’t want discussed, say these sources, is how closely it coordinated with Benjamin Netanyahu in the 1990s, when he led the Israeli Likud opposition and later when he was prime minister, to impede the Oslo peace process being pressed by President Bill Clinton and Israeli Prime Ministers Yitzhak Rabin and Shimon Peres.

“That could not only validate AIPAC’s critics, who accuse it of being a branch of the Likud, but also lead to an investigation of violations of the Foreign Agents Registration Act.

‘”What they don’t want out is that even though they publicly sounded like they were supporting the Oslo process, they were working all the time to undermine it,’ said a well-informed source.” 

Why the not-so-subtle public threats? Both Bloomfield and Rosen clearly feel that AIPAC violated the ethic of reciprocity when it cut loose Rosen and Weissman and halted funding for their legal defense. AIPAC fired the two to avoid indictment of the entire corporation in the aftermath of two harrowing FBI raids. Corporate criminal indictments probably would have led to AIPAC’s immediate implosion. The melodramatic sense of betrayal that permeates the defamation complaint hinges on the flawed deal lead prosecutor Paul McNulty offered to AIPAC: “We could make real progress and get AIPAC out from under all of us.” AIPAC subsequently put Rosen and Weissman on leave and later fired them, after, in Rosen’s view, “they had approved and rewarded the very behavior which they now condemned.” AIPAC also began deploying its considerable influence in the news media to carefully place stories characterizing Rosen’s work and comportment as unacceptable and uncharacteristic, seemingly oblivious to the idea that the same tactic could also be turned against it. These particular slights may be the straws that broke the camel’s back. Rosen’s angst is palpable as he quotes AIPAC executive director Howard Kohr’s harsh treatment:

“[M]r. Kohr subtly tried to make this case that Messrs. Rosen’s [another AIPAC employee] behavior was out of the ordinary for employees of the organization that considers itself one of the most powerful in Washington. At the same time, Mr. Kohr said he has taken steps to ensure that no lines in the future will be crossed by his lobbyists and analysts. ‘I will take steps necessary to ensure that every employee of AIPAC, now and in the future, conducts themselves in a manner of which you can be proud, using policies and procedures that provide transparency, accountability and maintain our effectiveness’ he said….”

Rosen cites a Jewish Telegraphic Agency report to make a surprisingly frank assertion that Kohr himself not only received classified information from Rosen, but also knew it was from U.S. intelligence sources:

“Further, on June 17, 2005, the Jewish Telegraphic Agency reported a different formulation to defame Steve Rosen: ‘No current employee knew that classified information was obtained from Larry Franklin or was involved in dissemination of such information,’ spokesperson Patrick Dorton said. In fact, Mr. Kohr had been told in writing that information obtained from Mr. Franklin originated from ‘intelligence’ sources, and Mr. Rosen knew no more about the sources or classification than Mr. Kohr.”

The seemingly defeatist maneuvers of this circular firing squad partially mask Rosen’s real strategy. Millions of dollars would do him little good behind bars or preserve AIPAC’s reputation if he prevails. What Rosen needs most is for AIPAC to pull him “out from under all this” as soon as possible. Otherwise AIPAC and the rest of the lobby will face the full wrath of Rosen’s accumulated arsenal: access to damning AIPAC internal information and a multitude of allies who follow the credo that “divided we fall.” Rosen, having recently proven his considerable powers even under indictment by derailing the nomination of Charles Freeman at the National Intelligence Council, now clearly expects AIPAC to muster the entirety of its own considerable resources to achieve concrete results before May 27. For bystanders, the key remaining question is whether Attorney General Eric Holder and President Barack Obama have the mettle to withstand the most intense maneuvers from all directions urging them to fold the Espionage Act trial before it begins.

Not since former attorney general Robert F. Kennedy ordered AIPAC’s parent organization to register as a foreign agent has the Israel lobby been as existentially threatened by rule of law in America. The elite mainstream press, from theWashington Post to the Wall Street Journal, has already pitched in to help by urging the DOJ to quickly march away from the prosecution. Pundits who before Barack Obama entered office saw the case as a threat to “freedom of the press” are now repositioning the trial as a vestigial legacy of the Bush administration’s pervasive secrecy.

But the passage of time has not played in AIPAC’s or the defendants’ favor. In the economic aftermath of a disastrous war empowered by carefully channeled disinformation, many Americans are questioning how rule of law might temper selective leaks from lobbyists obliviously liquidating U.S. tax dollars and soldiers in foreign follies. The Espionage Act should function like the financial industry’s Fair Disclosure regulation, which protects small investors from being victimized by larger investors trading on material inside information. If AIPAC obtains closely held information, shouldn’t all Americans instantly be privy? Also, that AIPAC is a de facto foreign agent covertly injecting Israeli government mandates into Congress and the executive branch isn’t quite the explosive secret AIPAC insiders presume it to be. In 2008, the DOJ grudgingly declassified all internal files detailing its earlier three-year fight to register AIPAC’s parent organization as a foreign agent. Any American who checks the Foreign Agents Registration Act against AIPAC’s routine activities knows it is the agent of a foreign power. Middle East historians have no need of Douglas Bloomfield’s verification that the Israel lobby thwarts presidential peace initiatives – the transcripts of Sen. J.W. Fulbright’s investigation of the Israel lobby in 1963 reveal precisely how such concerted actions thwarted the Johnson plan for Middle East peace. The issue is whether the Department of Justice will at long last stand up to AIPAC’s obvious violations of important laws that protect the interests of average Americans. Both John F. and Robert F. Kennedy struggled mightily and failed. If Obama and Holder similarly fail, it is not for lack of evidence now being delivered on silver platters from AIPAC operatives.

For – ironically – everything Steven Rosen alleges in his lawsuit and Bloomfield in his bluff is verifiably true. As an individual actor, Rosen truly is innocent of AIPAC’s protective ruse that he and Weissman alone were in any way unique at AIPAC. Yet another prior incident – also now public – substantiates this. AIPAC never adequately explained how its possession of a 300-page classified report in 1984 outlining the secret American negotiating position for the fatally flawed U.S.-Israel Free Trade Areacould possibly be legal. The U.S. government, even in 2009, still won’t declassify that report for an overdue public audit.

Steve Rosen’s late legal gambit cannot obscure the obvious. The real issue isn’t whether AIPAC failed its lobbyists by jettisoning them in a panic; it is whether the Department of Justice failed Americans when it didn’t indict the entire American Israel Public Affairs Committee. If Obama and Holder resist urgent pressures from the Israel lobby, Steve Rosen’s lawsuit may actually accomplish what prosecuting attorney McNulty could not – making all top AIPAC operatives finally stand trial together.

http://original.antiwar.com/smith_grant/2009/04/07/the-samson-gambit/

Tags:
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

HUNGARY UNDER THE ZIONIST YOKE

Sunday, April 26th, 2009

BUDAPEST, Hungary, April 20 (UPI) — Hungary’s Cabinet education and culture minister asked deputies in Parliament to pass a bill to make denying the Holocaust punishable by law. 

Istvan Hiller, the education and culture minister, told the lawmakers Monday the Holocaust denial is a crime in many European countries, adding there are questions about which there is no room for compromise, the Hungarian news agency MTI reported. [A similar project was rejected some years ago.]

Hiller said a democratic duty is to condemn Holocaust denial. Hundreds of far-right activists, many of them sporting uniforms similar to Nazi ones, demonstrated “against Zionist rule” and in favor of Holocaust denial in the streets of Budapest Saturday. On Sunday, Ildiko Lendvai, leader of the Hungarian Socialist party, said the Saturday demonstrators were Nazis. She said Holocaust denial should not happen in any European country without punishment, MTI reported.

http://www.upi.com/Top_News/2009/04/20/Hungary-plans-to-penalize-Holocaust-denial/UPI-95301240245590/

Tags:
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

HOW THE MOSSAD FORCED THE JEWS TO FLEE BAGHDAD

Friday, April 17th, 2009

Video
Interview: Naeim Giladi – Author of the Jews of Iraq 11-07-94 
Palestine Video

“Naeim Giladi (Hebrew: נעים גלעדי‎) (born 1929, Iraq, as Naeim Khalaschi) is an Anti-Zionist, and author of an autobiographical article and historical analysis entitled The Jews of Iraq… While living in Israel, his views of Zionism changed. He writes that, he “was disillusioned personally, disillusioned at the institutionalized racism, disillusioned at what I was begin ning to learn about Zionism’s cruelties. The principal interest Israel had in Jews from Islamic countries was as a supply of cheap labor, especially for the farm work that was beneath the urbanized Eastern European Jews. Ben Gurion needed the “Oriental” Jews to farm the thousands of acres of land left by Palestinians who were driven out by Israeli forces in 1948″….

http://www.uruknet.de/?p=53429

SEE ALSO Giladi’ short written testimony

http://www.uruknet.de/?s1=1&p=53429&s2=17

And his book in <pdf> form :

http://www.aaargh.codoh.com/fran/livres4/giladi.pdf  OR

http://www.aaargh.com.mx/fran/livres4/giladi.pdf

Tags:
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

AUSTRALIA, ALWAYS ON THE WRONG SIDE

Thursday, April 16th, 2009

Australia convicts Holocaust denier for continuing to post anti-Semitic claims
An Australian previously jailed in Germany and Austria for expounding his view that there were no mass killings of Jews in World War II was convicted Thursday of contempt of court in Melbourne for continuing to publish anti-Semitic material on his Web site. 

German-born former high school teacher Frederick Toben, 65, was the subject of a civil action by Jeremy Jones, a former president of the Executive Council of Australian Jewry, for defying a court order to stop publishing claims that the Holocaust never happened. 

Toben, who said he would choose to go to jail rather than pay a fine when he is sentenced later this month, said he had no regrets.
“If you believe in something and you want to have that freedom to express your opinions, then you should be prepared for sacrifices,” he said outside the court in Sydney. 

Last year, Toben was held in London under a European Union arrest warrant because he is wanted by the District Court in Mannheim, Germany, on charges of publishing material on the internet of an anti-Semitic or revisionist nature. 

Denying the Holocaust is an offence in Germany with a maximum jail term of five years. 

In 1999, Toben spent seven months in jail in Germany [NINE MONTHS] and has served an 11-month sentence in Austria for Holocaust denial. [FALSE. MISTAKE FOR DAVID IRVING]

In 2006, Toben was a speaker at a controversial two-day conference in Tehran organized by the Iranian government and attended by President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. There, he described as “mere puffery” the assertion that mass killings of Jews were carried out by the Nazis.

http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1078746.html

Tags:
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

IS OBAMA CRAZY, OR JUST STUPID?

Monday, April 13th, 2009

Remarks made by President Obama in the White House “on a new strategy for Afghanistan and Pakistan :

So let me be clear: Al Qaeda and its allies — the terrorists who planned and supported the 9/11 attacks — are in Pakistan and Afghanistan.

[This is the traditional Bush bunch of lies. Nobody believes such extroardinary invention. In Afghanistan and Pakistan, one meets people who struggle to liberate their country from the American yoke and military intervention.] Multiple intelligence estimates have warned that al Qaeda is actively planning attacks on the United States homeland from its safe haven in Pakistan. [Another layer of bushesque  bullshit. The greatest technical achievement of "Al Qaida" has been so far to explode trucks full of explosives, hardly a threat to the "homeland". ] And if the Afghan government falls to the Taliban — or allows al Qaeda to go unchallenged — that country will again be a base for terrorists who want to kill as many of our people as they possibly can. [It has never been and O. makes a fool of himself.]

The future of Afghanistan is inextricably linked to the future of its neighbor, Pakistan. In the nearly eight years since 9/11, al Qaeda and its extremist allies have moved across the border to the remote areas of the Pakistani frontier. [Ten kilometers in 8 years ! What a daring move !] This almost certainly includes al Qaeda’s leadership: Osama bin Laden [dead for years]  and Ayman al-Zawahiri. They have used this mountainous terrain as a safe haven to hide, to train terrorists, to communicate with followers, to plot attacks, and to send fighters to support the insurgency in Afghanistan. For the American people, this border region has become the most dangerous place in the world. [It is entirely their fault.]

For the Afghan people, a return to Taliban rule would condemn their country to brutal governance, international isolation, a paralyzed economy, and the denial of basic human rights to the Afghan people — especially women and girls. [This is exactly what they get with the present corrut regime, the warlords and the brutal US airforce raids.] The return in force of al Qaeda terrorists who would accompany the core Taliban leadership would cast Afghanistan under the shadow of perpetual violence. [guaranteed by US brutal intervention.]

Any improvement compared to Bush ? No, the same bunch of stupidities. Obama is another useless liar.

Tags:
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

DEMENTED JEWS

Monday, April 13th, 2009

Israelis Sue North Korea 
by Zalmen Nelson and Hana Levi Julian Israelis Sue North Korea

Thirty Israelis have filed suit against North Korea for injuries they received during the 2006 Second Lebanon War. 

The lawsuit, which totals more than $100 million, was filed in Washington and lists North Korea along with the Hizbullah terrorist organization. All of the plaintiffs hold United States citizenship. The suit charges that North Korea trained senior Hizbullah terrorists and built arms storage bunkers and other infrastructure which the group used against Israel in the 2006 war. It also alleges that North Korea trained senior Hizbullah operatives and helped the terrorists evade Israeli fighter jets, thereby allowing them to continue firing rockets at Israeli civilian areas. One of the structures built by North Korea was a 25-kilometer underground tunnel that Hizbullah used for the passage of terrorists, according to the report in Myanmar News. 

ARUTZ SHEVA 7 (The illegal Jewish settlers in the Occupied Territories’ voice).

They are crazy. Who would believe a word of Myanmar News anyway ? All this is bullshit adapted to Jewish needs.

Tags:
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

THE SILENCE OF MGR WILLIAMSON

Monday, April 13th, 2009

Straight from the horse’s mouth :

Don’t Cry

Eleison Comments LXXXIX

“Don’t cry for me , Argentina”, nor readers of “Eleison Comments” in any other part of the world, because you may have thought that the last two months have been difficult for the Eleison Commentator, but actually his condition is, as usual, rather better than he deserves. “Use each man according to his deserts”, says Hamlet, “and who should ’scape whipping ?”

When the media onslaught broke out some two months ago with the Pope for its main target, I was myself well protected inside the Seminary of La Reja. Journalists prowled round and around, but they did not get through. I only regret having had to leave La Reja and Argentina in circumstances that left me no chance of correctly taking leave of many Latin American colleagues and friends. Let priests, seminarians and layfolk all accept here the expression of my real gratitude for the five and a half happy years that I spent in their midst. Let everyone praying for me also accept my sincere gratitude. I will celebrate from tomorrow a novena of Masses for all your intentions.

For neither did the Society of St Pius X let me down when I landed in England. The District Superior in England had contacted the right friend of ours in London for there to be a little police escort sufficient to see me straight through the pack of “gentlemen of the Press” lying in wait for me, and ever since then I have been waited on hand and foot in the Society’s house in London. No work. No responsibilities. Who could complain?

Moreover the rest-cure looks like it is being prolonged. In a recent interview with the German weekly “Der Spiegel”, the Society’s Superior General is quoted to have said amongst other things, perhaps under pressure coming through the media – who missed their next onslaught on the Pope traveling to Africa, because he objected to artificial means of birth control? – “If Bishop Williamson is silent, if he stays out of sight, that would really be better for everyone… I hope that he drops out of public life for a long while… He has hurt the Society and damaged our reputation. We are definitely distancing ourselves from him… ”

Therefore the future is in God’s hands. I wish I could say that I object to being reduced to silence, but if the alternative is being reduced to saying only those things that the “gentlemen of the Press” do not object to, then I think I prefer the silence. As far back as 1985, the year of publication for “Iota Unum”, Romano Amerio’s famous analysis of Vatican II changes, the Italian Professor was anticipating that a time might come when there would be only silence left… Kyrie eleison.

London, England

http://dinoscopus.blogspot.com/

Tags:
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

IN CASE OF WAR, KILL INTERNET

Monday, April 13th, 2009

Cybersecurity Bill 

Proposes Unprecedented Government Power Over the Internet

A cybersecurity bill introduced today in the Senate would give the federal government extraordinary power over private sector Internet services, applications and software. The Cybersecurity Act of 2009 would, for example, give the President unfettered power to shut down Internet traffic in emergencies or disconnect any critical infrastructure system or network on national security grounds. The bill would grant the Commerce Department the ability to override all privacy laws to access any information about Internet usage in connection with a new role in tracking cybersecurity threats. The bill, introduced by Sens. John Rockefeller and Olympia Snowe, would also give the government unprecedented control over computer software and Internet services, threatening innovation, freedom and privacy. CDT President and CEO Leslie Harris said, “The cybersecurity threat is real, but such a drastic federal intervention in private communications technology and networks could harm both security and privacy.” April 01, 2009

Cybersecurity Act of 2009 <http://cdt.org/security/CYBERSEC4.pdf>   [PDF] April 01, 2009 

Bill Creating a White House Cybersecurity Advisor <http://cdt.org/security/CybAdvisr1.pdf>    [PDF] April 01, 2009

Tags:
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

HORST MAHLER’S HEROIC STRUGGLE

Sunday, April 12th, 2009
 
<www.globalfire.tv/nj/09de/verfolgungen/mahler.htm>
Translated from the German by J M Damon 

Would a liar be able to summon up such fortitude?
Attorney Horst Mahler is a hero for every German who wants to be a German.
With his youthful comrades filing legal self-accusations in order to fight political repression, his place in post-BRDDR history is assured.
The “BRDDR” (Bundes Republik Deutschland + Deutsche Demokratische RepubliK: the vassal BRD or Federal Republic of Germany merged with the vassal DDR or German Democratic Republic in 1989 to form the vassal BRDDR) courts are subjecting Mahler, 73, to endless trials in order to exhaust and impoverish him.
As the Süddeutsche Zeitung cynically reported:
“Under extreme security measures, another of Attorney Mahler’s countless trials began in Munich on Monday…
Probably not even Mahler is able to keep track of them all.” (sz.de, 12 Jan 2009)
As always, Germany’s Zionist-controlled media gave full vent up to unmitigated hatred  at the beginning of the trial, as Mahler again presented the results of what he has investigated in many years of tireless effort.
The media’s most frenzied attack is directed against his revelations of the Jewish Zionist national agenda, above all this observation: “‘Holocaust’ is the most powerful weapon that Judaism has ever employed against Germany” (Die Welt, 13 Jan 2009, p. 4)

Mahler has never suggested that ordinary individual Jews are Germany’s enemies, however.
He is referring to Jewish law, especially the Old Testament or Thora,  which designates the whole non Jewish world as its enemy. 
Mahler emphasizes that since the Jewish ruling elite consider us their enemy, we must take their hostile views into consideration.
This view is not new. 
The magazine Focus recently quoted the Roman historian Tacitus: “‘They consider everything unholy that we consider holy’ he observed, expressing amazement that the Jews ‘hate all other peoples as their enemies.’” (Focus, 38/2001, p. 130)
The Zionist controlled German media all agree on one point: Mahler must not be allowed to express defense arguments in court.
This can only mean that the German media are unanimously opposed to legitimate trial procedure, human rights and Democracy.
The leading news magazine Spiegel dismisses Mahler’s right to  a defense on account of “anti-democratic utterances.” (Focus, 38/2001, p. 130)

As the trial began, Presiding Judge Martin Rieder violated democratic principles and legal procedure by denying the accused opportunity to present his under extreme security measures (defense statement.) 
The Einlassung is firmly anchored in Western law and the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights.
 “The judge interrupted him and demanded that Mahler discontinue his utterances concerning Holocaust.” (sz.de, 12.01.2009)
German courts are clearly terrified of Mahler’s command of the facts, empirical evidence and eloquence: The judge “threatened to shut the eloquent 73 year old out of the main proceedings.” (spiegel.de, 12.01.2009)

From the Christian point of view, such suppression of empirical truth brings to mind St. Paul’s Letters.
Paul was persecuted by Jewish officials for telling the truth to the Galileeans, just as those who declare historical truth and warn of the Jewish plans for the world conquest are persectued today.
In his letter he asks the question: “Have I become your enemy becauce I tell the truth?” (Luther Bible, 1912, Galileeans 4:16)

In the following we are releasing (in italics) selected passages from Mahler’s opening statement, which was read aloud and disseminated in written form to the Court as well as the journalists present.  
For reasons of space we have had to abbreviate his homage to Sylvia Stolz, which we will soon release in a separate message.

****************
 

The Sham Trial of Horst Mahler Before 
Munich District Court II

Case Number 2 KLs 11 Js 42142/07

Opening Statement 

Yes!
I did indeed mail Germar Rudolf’s book Lectures on the Holocaust in digital form to three different addresses, and I also distributed the DVD Die kurzen Beine der heiligen Lüge to a large number of recipients.
I am standing here because I choose to stand here.
Do you know why I choose to do this?

[ON 23 JANUARY 2009, IN A RAGING STORM OF PERSECUTION, HORST MAHLER CELEBRATED HIS 73RD BIRTHDAY.
HE GAINS HIS INCREDIBLE STRENGTH TO DEFY THE DESTRUCTIVE MACHINERY OF THE PRESENT POLITICAL REGIME FROM HIS PRECISE UNDERSTANDING OF THE WAY THE WORLD ACTUALLY TURNS.
HIS ACCOUNT NUMBER FOR THOSE WHO WISH TO SUPPORT HIM:
BERLINER VOLKSBANK
KTO-NR. 5194719002
BLZ 10090000]

I respond to the question of why I am doing this with an observation by Prof. Robert Faurisson, the famous French revisionist and expert on the subject of the legends surrounding homicidal gas chambers.
These legends form the very heart of the “Holocaust” cult or religion.
The following quotation appeared in the newspaper La Montagne   on 8 January 2009: “The Zionist-American axis has bombed German children with phosphorus, bombed the Japanese with atomic bombs, bombed Vietnamese children with Agent Orange and bombed Iraki children with depleted uranium.
It is high time that the defeated, humiliated and slandered of the world strike back, and I have been doing this for many years with the “atom bomb of the poor.” 
That is Historical Revisionism.
Revisionism is a weapon kills and disfigures no one.
It destroys nothing but lies, slanders defamation, and the myth of “Shoa” along with its horrible “Shoa Business” that is so dear to the likes of Bernard Madoff, Elie Wiesel, all those “miraculously rescued” survivors of “Holocaust” and the murderers of the children of Gaza.

In the Book of John, Jesus spoke to the leaders of the Jews and said: “You belong to your father the devil, and you wish to carry out your father’s desire.
He was a murderer from the beginning, not holding to the truth, for there is no truth in him.
When he lies, he speaks his native language, for he is a liar and the father of lies.
And now because I tell the truth, you do not believe me!”  (John 8, 44-45)

Today we are living in a thoroughly Judaized world that is based on lies, and the greatest lie of all is the “Holocaust” lie. It is the first duty of every German who wants to remain German to combat this lie. I experience great pain when I observe how many of my fellow Germans, blinded by Satan, believe the lie to be the truth. They persecute those who, after great pain and effort, have struggled and escaped from the cave of illusions and now made their way back into the sunlight.

In carrying out my duty as a German to combat the “Holocaust” lie, I will give you some examples of what I mean.
The Jewish god Jahwe commands the Jews to conquer the world by means of usury, loaning money for interest, because it is written in their holy book: “The Lord thy God will bless you as he has promised, and you will lend to many nations, but you will borrow from none.
You will rule over many nations but none will rule over you.” (Deuteronomy 15,6)
and 
“You will lend to many nations but will borrow from none.
The Lord willl make you the head and not the tail.
If you obey the commands of the Lord that I give you this day and carefully follow them, you will always be at the top and never at the bottom.
Do not turn aside from any of the commands I give you today, neither to the right nor to the left, following other gods and serving them.” (Deuteronomy 28, 11-14.)
The Jews are commanded by Jahweh to enslave all the nations and kill all who resist.
Their holy book makes them the following promise: “Foreigners will rebuild your walls and their kings will serve you.
Although in anger I struck you, in favor I will show you compassion.
Your gates will always stand open. They will never be shut, day or night, so that men may bring you the wealth of nations, their kings leading them in procession.
For the nation that will not serve you shall perish, it shall be utterly ruined.” (Isaiah 60:13)
How foolish are the non-Jews who do not take these threats seriously!
The powerful Jews, the global money lords, live by these rules and follow them exactly. 
Once more it has become unmistakably clear that they do not have a bad conscience when they deceive and rob us… When they commit robbery and murder, they are but following the commandments of their god!

In our own time global Jewish rule is coming to its inevitable end. According to the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung of 10 January 2009, a historic break occurred in September 2008 with the bankruptcy of the Jewish bank Lehman Brothers.
 “With the implosion of unregulated ‘shadow’ banking, a main pillar of the neoliberal economic model has collapsed.” (FAZ, 10 Jan 2009, p. 19.)
Their money is gone and it will never return on the basis of private banking systems. This is because money is a social relationship of trust. The bearer of this trust was the private banking system. It is now understood that the private banking system was exposed to systematic deception.
We now know that, as a monetary system, it was identical with deception.
However a swindler can be successful only as long as he is not recognized as such.
Now the whole world has recognized the Jewish swindler for what he is!
Historically, National Socialism had recognized interest slavery as a malignant tumor in the national body, but not yet recognized the systemic compulsion to globalistic treachery as such.

Through their “Holocaust” cult, the Jews succeeded in following their compulsion unchecked in the “globalized” world for 20 years, until the present global collapse. 
During that time their success hindered recognition of global Jewry as the “negation of the lives of nations” (Martin Buber) that is, as a deceiver, thief and murderer of nations.
Now confidence in the Jewish currency, the “digital dollar,” is gone forever; and with this confidence goes the money itself: Jewish power disappears along with Jewish money.
The world has reached a turning point such as occurs once every thousand years.

In the present situation, money can again circulate only under the auspices of National Socialism in conjunction with the abolition of interest slavery.
Now the taxpayer is amazed to learn that the State has suddenly appeared as the savior and rescuer of the banks! 
However, the State was drowned in debt long ago. It is itself a nonproducing asset, hopelessly indebted to the Jewish banking system. The astronomical “rescue packages” that we read about are nothing except a recycled version of global monetary deception (see Hamer) inflated more than ever. They are bound to usher in sudden hyperinflation.

Only the State that liberates the national economy from debt slavery by nationalizing the banks on the basis of a truly national  (National Socialist) state will be able to create the necessary confidence for creating a new monetary system. 
Since developed nations with their complex division of labor cannot survive without a monetary system, the irresistible energy of national self-preservation will result in a revitalization of National Socialism. It will be Germany that, on the basis of its unique vocation and historical experience, shows the family of nations the way out of the present catastrophe. As a first step, our historic National Socialism, as embodied in Adolf Hitler, must be retrieved from the acid bath of Jewish lies and falsifications. Only this can bring about the end of the “Holocaust” cult.
The initial impulse for this international act of liberation must come from the German people themselves. This is because our natural allies in this struggle, especially in the Muslim world, cannot bring about anything effective as long as Germany continues to be perceived as a murderer of Jews. The GUTMENSCHEN (hypocritical do-gooders) among us, those who have succumbed to constant brainwashing and are now infected with the psychosis of self-hatred, must be confronted with the real cause of their malaise.
They are supporters of the moral genocide of more than just the German nation.
They also share responsibility for the genocides of the Palestinians, Iraqis, Afghanis and all the future genocides that are presently being plotted in the USA under the direction of Israel.
“Holocaust” persecution is the decisive front in the resistance struggle of Germans who are determined to be German.
The German courtroom is the battleground of this struggle. Sylvia Stolz, the attorney from Ebersberg whom many call the “German Joan of Arc,” has set the most intrepid example for us. She has given us the best example of how to proceed, and I salute her with boundless gratitude and respect. She has become my life’s companion and my dearest comrade in the struggle.

The age of moral personalism began in 1933, with Germany’s ascendancy under National Socialism.  United in the true national spirit, Germany was large enough and strong enough to cast off the yoke of interest slavery and take the lead in the global revolution against Mammonism.
In the native lands of “laissez-faire” individualism – Great Britain, France and the USA, National Socialist Germany was a mortal threat to the old order of things on account of its example. 
In response to this danger, the powers of the Old Order conspired against the German Reich, the challenger, in order to defeat it with their combined strength.
They did this under the leadership of the plutocrats, or Lords of Money, even though these powers were traditional enemies of one another.
They hoped to drive National Socialism from the stage of world history forever. The specific requirements for continued success of the Money Lords are as follows:

1. Their relentless war against the German Reich must be made to appear as peace.
2. Germany must perceive its enemies as its friends.
3. We Germans must be made to believe that the Basic Law imposed on us by the victors of World War II is our “constitution” and that the “Federal Republic” is our state. 
We must be made to think that the collaborators appointed to rule over us are legitimate representatives of our nation.
4. We Germans must continue to be brainwashed in order to maintain our guilt complex or psychosis, which makes it impossible for us to be proud of our nation and our history.
5. We Germans must be made to internally deny and resist our innate hostility to Judaism and “God’s chosen people,” our eternal enemies.  We must conceive of our eternal enemies as “innocent victims” of our irrational hatred and envy. 
We must continue to perform every conceivable form of repentance exercise and pay unending tribute.
6. By means of ever-intensifying propaganda of lies and deceit, the National Socialist Weltanschauung must appear to coming generations as a product of hell, so that unbiased consideration will forever be an impossibility.
Any possible approach to the subject of National Socialism must bring a Pavlovian sweat of anxiety to their brows of all our people..
7. Instead of a National Socialist view, we Germans must have the “American Way of Life” hammered into our skulls as the only desirable and worthwhile truth — incessantly and in all areas.
8. In order to neutralize our characteristic German compulsion to improve the world, the evil desires that lurk in everyone must be titillated with the most sophisticated methods.
In view of the omnipresent decadence of those around us, we must finally give in to despair and accept that “man is evil by nature..”  
We must believe that our attempts to improve mankind merely make fools of ourselves.
9. Our natural resistance to this propaganda of decadence must be overcome by Jewish power and control of the media. Our resistance must be sunk into a spiral of silence.
10. In order to maintain this spiral of silence, those individuals who choose historical correctness over political correctness must be silenced through use of the criminal laws.

Now put these observations to the test by exposing them to actual experience:
Is it possible that the enemy who believes he is commissioned to enslave all the peoples of the world, and to crush all those who resist –- the enemy who also realizes that he is hated by all the nations –- is it credible that this enemy would suddenly be filled with love for mankind, especially for us Germans?
Is it believable that following his military victory over the Reich, our enemy has abandoned his war aims?
Is it believable that our enemy would voluntarily open up his most potent psychological weapon (the “Auschwitz Cudgel” as Martin Walser call it) to scrutiny by independent courts in the nation he conquered? 
Our enemy still needs this weapon, and discovery of its secrets  would hurl him into the abyss.
Whoever believes such a thing is beyond all help!
The Stolz trial was an attempt by the enemy to protect its heavy artillery, which is emplaced in the German courtroom.
It was a desperate attempt to protect this artillery from observation and destruction.
Whether the enemy’s attempt will be successful or not, depends on all of us.
It is time that we rise up against foreign rule by our enemies!

I am standing before you because I cannot do otherwise.
I cannot live in a Judaized world.
I am not willing to kill myself in order to escape it, however; Therefore, my only alternative is to commit everything I have as my contribution to changing this Judaized world.

Deutschland erwache!
Wake up Germany!

<www.globalfire.tv/nj/09de/verfolgungen/mahler.htm>

Tags:
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

« Older Entries